<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Successful Sampling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cratel.wichita.edu/blogs/stevewilson/2007/04/17/successful-sampling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cratel.wichita.edu/blogs/stevewilson/2007/04/17/successful-sampling/</link>
	<description>Aesthetics, Electronic Music, and Philosophy from someone who reads too many books.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 02:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve&#8217;s Stuff &#187; Team USA update</title>
		<link>http://cratel.wichita.edu/blogs/stevewilson/2007/04/17/successful-sampling/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve&#8217;s Stuff &#187; Team USA update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 04:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cratel.wichita.edu/blogs/stevewilson/2007/04/17/successful-sampling/#comment-348</guid>
		<description>[...] As I previously posted, I&#8217;ve switched from Pd to Reaktor for the majority of my sound design. This is because it offered a lot of power and flexibility in a short amount of time. Had I had maybe an extra three weeks, I would have probably been able to use Pd instead. See my previous post on Reaktor for more info and for some screen shots of the Reaktor code. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I previously posted, I&#8217;ve switched from Pd to Reaktor for the majority of my sound design. This is because it offered a lot of power and flexibility in a short amount of time. Had I had maybe an extra three weeks, I would have probably been able to use Pd instead. See my previous post on Reaktor for more info and for some screen shots of the Reaktor code. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
